Re: Two questions here. Is the Pridnestrovian Ruble not used enough to be added to Unicode, and did I mess up by sending my proposal thrice?

Markus Scherer via Unicode <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.unicode.general
Message-ID <CAN49p6qW9--JL3hFsASCUMNjMbhBE3C4==qwD5sLj6H2-C0VtA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:18 AM kxeo via Unicode <[email protected]>
wrote:

> They haven't responded in two weeks. Patience may be key but something
> tells me that they aren't getting back. Did the triple email make them
> no longer respond? Maybe it was the double email, or maybe they're just
> drowning in emails?
>

Unicode does not work that fast, and shouldn't, because once a character is
encoded, it is permanent, and adds to what everyone has to implement.

If you look in the document register https://www.unicode.org/L2/L-curdoc.htm
--
you will see document L2/24-134 “Proposal to Encode a Pridnestrovian Ruble
Sign”

There is also document L2/24-166 “Recommendations to UTC #180 July 2024 on
Script Proposals” which briefly discusses this proposal, points to an
earlier proposal, and makes some suggestions.
The Script Encoding Working Group will present L2/24-166 in the quarterly
UTC meeting this week.

Best regards,
markus
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.