Re: Pictographic zodiacal symbols
Asmus Freytag via Unicode <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
There's arguably a distinction between symbols and pictographs, even if both signify the same concept. This is different from the case two different sets of pictographs or two different sets of symbolic notation. Although, even in those cases it is useful to consider the question: can one of them be substituted for the other with the reader experiencing the choice as stylistic? A./ On 8/10/2024 3:48 PM, Leo Broukhis via Unicode wrote: > What's the semantic difference between the two sets? Without it, it's > just different fonts. > > Leo > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 2:00 AM A. Stötzner via Unicode > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Besides the simple typographic set of 12 zodiac characters there > is a tradition of another set, consisting of pictographic symbols > of the 12 zodiac signs, which also play a role in typography (~ > 16th c. onwards) > Has this set been proposed for encoding at any time in the past? > greetings, > Andreas Stötzner > __________________________________________________________________ > *Andreas Stötzner* > Gestaltung · Archivpflege · Fontentwicklung > Klauflügelweg 21 · 88400 Biberach a.d. Riß > 0176-86823396 · [email protected] > [email protected] · Andronfonts.com <https://andronfonts.com/> >