RE: Position of the registered sign
Peter Constable via Unicode <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <MN2PR02MB6413DD760F29E215D957713F86622@MN2PR02MB6413.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> |
The US Code Title 17, section 401 specifies simply the symbol © (the letter C in a circle), or the word “Copyright”, or the abbreviation “Copr.”; https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap4.html I don't think any US court is likely to support a claim that superscripting of the symbol is semantically significant. Peter -----Original Message----- From: Unicode <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ivan Panchenko via Unicode Sent: Monday, September 16, 2024 12:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Position of the registered sign To make it clear: There is a semantic difference because superscripting makes it an annotation. Simply writing “Unicode®” with the circle on the baseline seems wrong to me because it is like writing “UnicodeReg. U.S. Pat. & Tm. Off.”. Another discrepancy that I noticed concerns the hourglass emojis. Originally, there was just one (⌛, U+231B). The reference glyph shows all of the sand below, in some designs, however, the sand is still flowing. Now that we have U+23F3 (⏳, hourglass with flowing sand), it would make sense that U+231B is shown without flowing sand; in some designs, however, this is not the case (perhaps to remain consistent with how it was before) and U+23F3 has a greater proportion of the sand at the top.