Re: Position of the registered sign
"Mark E. Shoulson via Unicode" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 9/18/24 09:56, Jukka K. Korpela via Unicode wrote: > Ivan Panchenko wrote via Unicode ([email protected]) : > >> The registered sign (®, U+00AE) is already shown in superscript in some typefaces and on the baseline in others. > The vertical position and the size (relative to font size) indeed varies. > > .... >> How about standardizing the position? Wouldn't belatedly making a "standard" of something that's been around so long also create a lot of hassle for font designers, etc? All of a sudden, fonts that have been perfectly conformant for decades suddenly are non-conformant, and people have to come out with new versions. Or what is FAR more likely, nobody cares and nobody notices and everyone leaves the fonts alone, in which case what has been accomplished? We'd have successfully declared some set of fonts "non-conformant", but on the plus side... um. On the plus side, what? ~mark