Re: Position of the registered sign
James Kass via Unicode <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.unicode.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2024-09-18 9:55 PM, Asmus Freytag via Unicode wrote: > > ... In this case, the maximum we could do is rate some designs as > "most suitable for plain text interchange and viewing" and explain > why: the general expectation to see this symbol shown as an annotation ... This assertion about the general expectation needs proof. If true, then legacy Microsoft fonts which use the same metrics for the © and ® symbols have been wrong "since long". As far as I can tell, the symbol is normal sized when used in running text. It only appears to be an annotation when used in conjuction with a logo. It's true that appearing with a logo is a most likely spot to find it. But logos and their annotations need rich text. It could be argued that the EMI logo appearing in a scan linked recently has the ® shown at a perfectly normal size, and that it's the logo which has been made so incredibly larger that it hangs way below the baseline. Logos on various products are designed to be large and to stand out. Sales and Marketing 101. > > We might also look at the origin and if all source character sets > unified into the original Unicode had this symbol superscripted, we > could state that historical fact. > But suppose they don't. Legacy charts, as I recall, show the © and ® symbols as having the same metrics. Like in this chart on page 10: https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC2/WG3/docs/n411.pdf