Re: [DISCUSS] Switching to GIt?
Cédric Damioli <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Nov 2023 15:51:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.cocoon.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Apache Software Foundation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I know my answer will be sort of chicken-egg issue, but I'd like to be sure that there is enough manpower to revive and/or continue to maintain the project, before putting efforts to move to Git. My 2 cents, Cédric Le 20/11/2023 à 15:43, Christofer Dutz a écrit : > > Hi all, > > I know that we currently have a mirror of the SVN in Github, however > still the root repository is SVN, I would like to propose switching to > using Git as the main repo. > > This would allow us to start using the normal GitHub Pull-Request > workflow and possibly make it a lot easier for new contributors to > contribute. > > Also, would I propose to start using GitHub Actions, GitHub Issues and > GitHub discussions as in other projects this has proven to lower the > barriers for new contributors (And it avoids the Jira account > approving nightmare). With the changes in the messaging defaults, that > I recently deployed, mirroring GitHub activity to the dev-list should > allow everyone to participate. > > What do the others think? > > Chris >