Re: [VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x
Francesco Chicchiriccò <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Dec 2023 16:05:36 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.cocoon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------f30PXntt1xKybqe0o9L0uRz0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 13/12/23 15:00, Cédric Damioli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following and according to last weeks' discussions, it seems that the general consensus would be to retire 2.1 (too old to be maintained) and 3.0 (too alpha to be maintained), and keep 2.x around for now.
>
> If I try to summarize what have been said, refocusing on a single product would give the project a chance to 1) provide a clear upgrade path to existing 2.1 users and 2) gather renewed interest.
> For the still many existing 2.1 users, this would give a clear signal that it's time to consider other options.
>
> It's now time to formally vote:
>
> [ ] +1 accept (retire and officially stop the maintenance of 2.1/3.0 branches, only keeping 2.x)
> [ ] -1 reject (explanation required)
>
> A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are required to pass.
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
+1
Regards.
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Member at The Apache Software Foundation
Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
--------------f30PXntt1xKybqe0o9L0uRz0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 13/12/23 15:00, Cédric Damioli
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:[email protected]">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
Hi,<br>
<br>
Following and according to last weeks' discussions, it seems that
the general consensus would be to retire 2.1 (too old to be
maintained) and 3.0 (too alpha to be maintained), and keep 2.x
around for now.<br>
<br>
If I try to summarize what have been said, refocusing on a single
product would give the project a chance to 1) provide a clear
upgrade path to existing 2.1 users and 2) gather renewed interest.<br>
For the still many existing 2.1 users, this would give a clear
signal that it's time to consider other options.<br>
<br>
It's now time to formally vote:<br>
<br>
[ ] +1 accept (retire and officially stop the maintenance of
2.1/3.0 branches, only keeping 2.x)<br>
[ ] -1 reject <span style="color:#1D1D1D" lang="EN-US">
(explanation required)<br>
</span>
<p class="MsoNormal"
style="caret-color: rgb(29, 29, 29);font-variant-caps: normal;orphans: auto;text-align:start;widows: auto;-webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;word-spacing:0px">
<span style="color:#1D1D1D" lang="EN-US">A minimum of 3 binding
+1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 </span><span
style="color:#1D1D1D" lang="EN-US">are required to pass.<br>
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.</span></p>
</blockquote>
+1<br>
Regards.<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="0">--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.tirasa.net/">http://www.tirasa.net/</a>
Member at The Apache Software Foundation
Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/">http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------f30PXntt1xKybqe0o9L0uRz0--