Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x

Gabriel Gruber <[email protected]> Sun, 28 Jan 2024 15:49:39 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.cocoon.devel
Message-ID <AS2PR02MB9656DC4C5A1E7A6D127B55CC9F7F2@AS2PR02MB9656.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
--_000_AS2PR02MB9656DC4C5A1E7A6D127B55CC9F7F2AS2PR02MB9656eurp_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Going to github would make things a lot easier. Who could do that?
Gabriel

Gesendet von Outlook f=FCr Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
________________________________
From: J=F6rg Heinicke <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2024 4:37:25 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x

I'd also rather go with porting to Git as next step.

Besides, this seems a necessary prerequisite to revive the community
since it reduces the hurdle to get people involved.

J=F6rg

On 23.01.24 17:54, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Possibly worth discussing if it=92s easier to port to Git and do that the=
n
> =85 or if better done in SVN =85 I guess the final discussion Git vs. SVN
> still needs to formally be done, right?
>
> Chris
>
> *Von: *C=E9dric Damioli <[email protected]>
> *Datum: *Dienstag, 23. Januar 2024 um 17:30
> *An: *[email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Betreff: *Re: AW: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x
>
> +1
>
> C=E9dric
>
> Le 23/01/2024 =E0 17:25, Christofer Dutz a =E9crit :
>
>     Yeah =85 I also think that possibly making them read-only (and
>     additionally prefixing them with a =93retired/=94 prefix should be en=
ough.
>
>     Chris

--_000_AS2PR02MB9656DC4C5A1E7A6D127B55CC9F7F2AS2PR02MB9656eurp_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3DWindows-1=
252">
</head>
<body>
<div dir=3D"auto">Going to github would make things a lot easier. Who could=
 do that?</div>
<div dir=3D"auto">Gabriel</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div id=3D"ms-outlook-mobile-signature" dir=3D"auto">Gesendet von <a href=
=3D"https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg">
Outlook f=FCr Android</a></div>
<hr style=3D"display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex=3D"-1">
<div id=3D"divRplyFwdMsg" dir=3D"ltr"><font face=3D"Calibri, sans-serif" st=
yle=3D"font-size:11pt" color=3D"#000000"><b>From:</b> J=F6rg Heinicke &lt;j=
[email protected]&gt;<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, January 28, 2024 4:37:25 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> [email protected] &lt;[email protected]&gt;<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x</font>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<div class=3D"BodyFragment"><font size=3D"2"><span style=3D"font-size:11pt;=
">
<div class=3D"PlainText">I'd also rather go with porting to Git as next ste=
p.<br>
<br>
Besides, this seems a necessary prerequisite to revive the community<br>
since it reduces the hurdle to get people involved.<br>
<br>
J=F6rg<br>
<br>
On 23.01.24 17:54, Christofer Dutz wrote:<br>
&gt; Possibly worth discussing if it=92s easier to port to Git and do that =
then<br>
&gt; =85 or if better done in SVN =85 I guess the final discussion Git vs. =
SVN<br>
&gt; still needs to formally be done, right?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Chris<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; *Von: *C=E9dric Damioli &lt;[email protected]&gt;<br>
&gt; *Datum: *Dienstag, 23. Januar 2024 um 17:30<br>
&gt; *An: *[email protected] &lt;[email protected]&gt;<br>
&gt; *Betreff: *Re: AW: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; +1<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; C=E9dric<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Le 23/01/2024 =E0 17:25, Christofer Dutz a =E9crit&nbsp;:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Yeah =85 I also think that possibly making the=
m read-only (and<br>
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; additionally prefixing them with a =93retired/=
=94 prefix should be enough.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Chris<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>

--_000_AS2PR02MB9656DC4C5A1E7A6D127B55CC9F7F2AS2PR02MB9656eurp_--