Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x

I'd also rather go with porting to Git as next step.

Besides, this seems a necessary prerequisite to revive the community
since it reduces the hurdle to get people involved.

J=C3=B6rg

On 23.01.24 17:54, Christofer Dutz wrote:
> Possibly worth discussing if it=E2=80=99s easier to port to Git and do t=
hat then
> =E2=80=A6 or if better done in SVN =E2=80=A6 I guess the final discussio=
n Git vs. SVN
> still needs to formally be done, right?
>
> Chris
>
> *Von: *C=C3=A9dric Damioli <[email protected]>
> *Datum: *Dienstag, 23. Januar 2024 um 17:30
> *An: *[email protected] <[email protected]>
> *Betreff: *Re: AW: AW: [RESULT][VOTE] Retire 2.1/3.0 and keep 2.x
>
> +1
>
> C=C3=A9dric
>
> Le 23/01/2024 =C3=A0 17:25, Christofer Dutz a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
>
>     Yeah =E2=80=A6 I also think that possibly making them read-only (and
>     additionally prefixing them with a =E2=80=9Cretired/=E2=80=9D prefix=
 should be enough.
>
>     Chris