Re: Schema for SOAP causes significant problems using XML 1.1? (rec 20 & 22)

On Mon, 3 May 2004 [email protected] wrote:

> As an example of the issues that arise, consider the schema declaration at
> [2].
>
>       <xs:complexType name="NotUnderstoodType">
>         <xs:attribute name="qname" type="xs:QName" use="required" />
>       </xs:complexType>
>
> I think that means that if you don't understand a header named by one of
> the new XML 1.1 element names, you can't construct the fault to tell anyone
> about it (because xs:QName clearly and unambiguously disallows the new XML
> 1.1 name chars.)    Of course, that begs the question of whether the header

In that case, the spec should align the definitions, of header name and
what gets into the fault, the fact that the two definition are not
matching (or matching by luck) seems more like a bug of our spec than a
bug in XML.

-- 
Yves Lafon - W3C
"Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."