Re: Action Item - Part I: WSRX and MEP signaling on the wire
David Hull <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.distributed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark Baker wrote: >On 1/5/06, David Hull <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> The *TP protocols provide suspiciously similar >>functionality, but aimed at a different target. >> >> > >It's the *same* target, hence the suspicious similarity. Really. >That's why I've been so vocal about this for the past 6 years!! >Loosely coupled document exchange between distributed applications; >that's what we're all after, right? > > Only if you agree that messaging is essentially the same as loosely coupled document exchange, which I don't. From my point of view, document exchange is one useful segment of the design space. Messaging is another. See my previous post for more detail. >Mark. >-- >Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca >Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com > > >