Re: The role of transfer protocols
Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.distributed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David Hull wrote: <snip/> > Whether it makes sense to build message delivery on top of document > transfer protocols depends on what you're trying to move where and what > tools are available. I certainly wouldn't rule it out, but I would also > look for more appropriate solutions, which is one reason I'm currently > poring over SOAP/XMPP and SOAP/BEEP. You might indeed look into XMPP (RFC 3920), the SOAP XMPP Binding (JEP-0072), and the XMPP extension for advanced message processing (JEP-0079): RFC 3920: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3920.txt JEP-0072: http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0072.html JEP-0079: http://www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0079.html We developed JEP-0079 with input from the creator of BEEP, so I think it does most of the key stuff you'd want for message-level acks and such. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.shtml
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3.6 KB) - not displayed