Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts
Rich Salz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.distributed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> That's a different MEP. If your transport gives you request-response > natively, you use "request-response with optional SOAPiness". If it > gives you true fire and forget, you use "fire-and-forget one-way" (TBD). Thanks for the clarification. Do you htink it's legitimate for parts of the SOAP stack to turn a "no SOAP response" from the transport/transfer layer, into an empty soap message? /r$ -- SOA Appliance Group IBM Application Integration Middleware * This address is going away; please use [email protected] *