Re: Rewrite of SOAP 1.2 Adjuncts

Rich Salz wrote:

>>That's a different MEP.  If your transport gives you request-response
>>natively, you use "request-response with optional SOAPiness".  If it
>>gives you true fire and forget, you use "fire-and-forget one-way" (TBD).
>>    
>>
>
>Thanks for the clarification.
>
>Do you htink it's legitimate for parts of the SOAP stack to turn a "no
>SOAP response" from the transport/transfer layer, into an empty soap
>message?
>  
>
I've proposed it (it's "DH1" on the table I sent a while ago), but I'm
no longer so sure it's the best way to go.

>	/r$
>  
>