Re: Repeating Table Captions Across Pages
Chris Bowditch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.fop.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AM9PR09MB4755D82D246DB2020D89BBB7FB110@AM9PR09MB4755.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com> |
Sorry for slow reply, but yes table markers do work and no need for the workarounds you found; they have been superceded The reason for a partial implementation status is that they can only handle a single line of text. Showing (continued) or sub totals will work perfectly. What you can't do with table markers is place an image, a sub table, or a paragraph of text in them Thanks, Chris On 01/09/2020 23:44, Kirkilis, John (Nokia - US/Austin) wrote: > > Greetings, > > I’ve spent a couple hours in the mail archives trying to determine the > current state of the implementation of retrieve-table-marker. The > compliance table states that this is still just partially implemented, > and I’d like to understand what works and does not work in FOP 2.5. > > The archives yielded a couple work-arounds, one that uses regular > markers and the other which uses table-markers, but these are at least > 8 years old and I can’t tell if they’ve been superceded. > > * https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg18790/example-1.fo > > * https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg18521.html > > > I need a solution that can generate repeating table titles with the > string “(continued)†on the 2^nd and subsequent pages of a long table. > These pages are generated dynamically using the DITA Open-Toolkit’s > DITA to FO transform, which we’ve customized when needed. > > Here’s what I’d like to understand: > > * What is the current state of the retrieve-table-marker compliance? > * Is full compliance needed to support repeating table titles? > * If so, how much effort would be required to address it? > o by a regular FOP contributor > o a Master’s student with Java background > * If not, what’s the most up-to-date method to implement repeating > table titles using a work-around for FOP 2.5? > > Thanks in advance for any feedback, > > John >