Re: Repeating Table Captions Across Pages

Chris Bowditch <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.fop.user
Message-ID <AM9PR09MB4755D82D246DB2020D89BBB7FB110@AM9PR09MB4755.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Sorry for slow reply, but yes table markers do work and no need for the 
workarounds you found; they have been superceded

The reason for a partial implementation status is that they can only 
handle a single line of text. Showing (continued) or sub totals will 
work perfectly. What you can't do with table markers is place an image, 
a sub table, or a paragraph of text in them

Thanks,

Chris

On 01/09/2020 23:44, Kirkilis, John (Nokia - US/Austin) wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I’ve spent a couple hours in the mail archives trying to determine the 
> current state of the implementation of retrieve-table-marker. The 
> compliance table states that this is still just partially implemented, 
> and I’d like to understand what works and does not work in FOP 2.5.
>
> The archives yielded a couple work-arounds, one that uses regular 
> markers and the other which uses table-markers, but these are at least 
> 8 years old and I can’t tell if they’ve been superceded.
>
>   * https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg18790/example-1.fo
>
>   * https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg18521.html
>
>
> I need a solution that can generate repeating table titles with the 
> string “(continued)†on the 2^nd and subsequent pages of a long table. 
> These pages are generated dynamically using the DITA Open-Toolkit’s 
> DITA to FO transform, which we’ve customized when needed.
>
> Here’s what I’d like to understand:
>
>   * What is the current state of the retrieve-table-marker compliance?
>   * Is full compliance needed to support repeating table titles?
>   * If so, how much effort would be required to address it?
>       o by a regular FOP contributor
>       o a Master’s student with Java background
>   * If not, what’s the most up-to-date method to implement repeating
>     table titles using a work-around for FOP 2.5?
>
> Thanks in advance for any feedback,
>
> John
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.