Re: Re: Jing and libxml2 is right, Trang is wrong
David Tolpin <[email protected]> Sat, 6 Mar 2004 13:37:01 +0400 (AMT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.relaxng.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > Also, now that RELAX NG is an ISO standard, I don't think that the > consequences of this choice are big enough to justify an update. > Eric, I am not pushing for an immediate update. This change would not make Relax NG more powerful; and the fix for trang has turned out to be simple. However, if there will be a process of delivering a cleaned-up new version of Relax NG, this case should be considered, I think. I also think it can just as well be included into errata; there are other things (such as a clarification for the groupability of notAllowed) to mention there anyway. This would be a backward-compatible change, it will not break any of the existing stylesheets and make Trang valid without my patch. David