Re: Re: Jing and libxml2 is right, Trang is wrong

On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 13:37:01 +0400 (AMT)
David Tolpin <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> However, if there will be a process of delivering a cleaned-up
> new version of Relax NG, this case should be considered, I think.

ISO can publish technical corrigenda.  However,  unless the spec 
is completely broken, I (and probably the Japanese national member 
body) will oppose to any changes that affect implementations.  I 
believe that stability of RELAX NG is much more important at this 
stage of the game, and I do not think the spec is broken here.

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <[email protected]>