Re: Re: Jing and libxml2 is right, Trang is wrong

> > 
> > However, if there will be a process of delivering a cleaned-up
> > new version of Relax NG, this case should be considered, I think.
>
> ISO can publish technical corrigenda.  However,  unless the spec 
> is completely broken, I (and probably the Japanese national member 
> body) will oppose to any changes that affect implementations.  I 
> believe that stability of RELAX NG is much more important at this 
> stage of the game, and I do not think the spec is broken here.

The spec is not broken. You are right. 

Is the page on Relax NG maintained ? 
Can the fix to Trang be made publicly available so that Relax NG
schema development could proceed with the compact syntax as an 
authoring notation?

The problem with converting compact syntax for group in start to
XML  syntax is not made up. It is from a real company producing a
real Relax NG schema for a W3C approved recommendation.