Re: Larger than 32bit signed?
"Marc Conrad" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.rpc.specification |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
I fully agree with keeping the standard as is, for
the reasons iterated in a number of other
messages. Even more, such an extended standard
is alive and exists if we choose to believe Wikipedia:
"[XML-RPC] was first created by Dave Winer of UserLand
Software in 1995 with Microsoft. However, Microsoft considered it
too simple and started adding functionality. After several rounds of
this,
the standard was no longer so simple and became what is now SOAP."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML-RPC (as of 09 February 2006)
I use XML-RPC for my teaching in Distributed Computing because it has
all the essentials necessary for a Distributed Application and not much
else
that distracts from the real issue, or to say the same differently:
If I teach CORBA, my students learn CORBA
If I teach RMI, my students learn RMI
If I teach SOAP, my students learn SOAP
If I teach XML-RPC, my students learn Distributed Computing.
Cheers, Marc
--
Marc Conrad - Luton, Southampton, Merzig, Podstrana
http://perisic.com/marc
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xml-rpc/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/