Re: Larger than 32bit signed?
Mark Ellzey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.rpc.specification |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
So the short answer to all of this is: "no there is never going to be
a change in the spec". I thought that native support of common
integral data types were something the general community could use,
but I was mistaken. The fact that xml-rpc does not have a version
specification makes any additions impossible.
I apologize to those who have answered this question before. Yes I did
do a search - but my search was specific to signed/unsigned integers.
Thank you all for your opinions and answers.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xml-rpc/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/