Re: qualified name argument to startElement

Elliotte Rusty Harold <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Apr 2004 07:06:25 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.sax.devel
Message-ID <p06010206bcb3eed5638e@[192.168.254.88]>
At 5:25 PM +0200 4/26/04, ?Mikael St=E5ldal wrote:

>I have an application which uses the SAX ContentHandler interface as a
>general pipeline for XML data. The application (which is not a parser)
>invokes methods on a ContentHandler, and sometimes the XML data is
>programmatically generated, i.e. not originating from XML source. In that
>case there are no prefixes and no qualified names (only namespace URI:s
>and local names), and it would be a PITA to have to generate
>namespace prefixes which would not be used anyway.

You would not have to do this. You would just=20
pass the local name for each argument. That is=20
you'd pass the same String object twice in the=20
method call. A qualified name is *not* a prefixed=20
name, though the SAX docs are misleading on this=20
point, and we should probably fix that too.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   [email protected]
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulai=
tA


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297
_______________________________________________
List: sax-devel, [email protected]
See:  http://www.saxproject.org/
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel