Re: XMLReaderFactory.createXMLReader()
Elliotte Rusty Harold <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:03:58 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.sax.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p0601020bbcb4187a2c66@[192.168.254.88]> |
At 3:59 PM +0200 4/27/04, Mikael St=E5ldal wrote: >OK, it sounds reasonable for a parser vendor to modify XMLReaderFactory >IF they bundle the SAX classes with the parser. But I don't think we >should require parser vendors to bundle the SAX classes with the parser. >And in particular, parser vendors should not bundle the SAX classes with >the parser if modifying XMLReaderFactory is the ONLY REASON. I think it is reasonable and indeed should be=20 expected for SAX parser vendors to bundle the SAX=20 classes. A lot of people are still using Java 1.3=20 and earlier that don't bundle SAX. It's better if=20 you don't have to go to multiple sites to=20 download all the code required to make something=20 work. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold [email protected] Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulai= tA ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 _______________________________________________ List: sax-devel, [email protected] See: http://www.saxproject.org/ https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel