Re: [request to review, and vote] XalanJ 2.7.3 release candidate RC10

Hi,

I count 2 +1 from PMC member. The vote can passes because no veto (-1 
vote) and perhaps this vote is on under the lazy consensus way?

https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

"Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule 
unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes 
than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- 
regardless of the number of votes in each category. (If the number of 
votes seems too small to be representative of a community consensus, the 
issue is typically not pursued. However, see the description of lazy 
consensus for a modifying factor.)"


Milamber

On 29/03/2023 10:03, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
> Hi all,
>      We need more Xalan pmc reviews, to have this RC declared to be approved.
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:22 PM Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Thank you Mukul for this RC.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> - Reviewing src zip: ASC, SHA files OK.
>> - Building runtime with 'chmod +x ./build.sh && ./build.sh clean fulldist' OK.
>> - Following the README, there is confusion because the unzipped src zip creates a `xalan-test` folder as a child folder but the README describes it as a sibling folder. Does this skew the tests or cause issues?
>> - TODOs later:
>> -- Fix Javadoc errors
>> -- Test output should be quieter in non-debug mode: No need to tell me all the test files that PASS, I have no idea if I am missing any failure output without tediously reviewing ALL console output.
>>
>> Using:
>>
>> ant -version
>> Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13 compiled on January 4 2023
>>
>> java -version
>> openjdk version "1.8.0_362"
>> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_362-bre_2023_01_22_03_32-b00)
>> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.362-b00, mixed mode)
>>
>> uname -a
>> Darwin *** 22.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.3.0: Mon Jan 30 20:42:11 PST 2023; root:xnu-8792.81.3~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
>>
>> Gary
>