Re: [request to review, and vote] XalanJ 2.7.3 release candidate RC10
Gary Gregory <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Mar 2023 06:34:52 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xalan.devel,gmane.text.xml.xalan.java.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACZkXPwOAruVZjY4CQZcJ+YE81ouEmuJvKyUdSjuwVLktynTAg@mail.gmail.com> |
--00000000000087efc305f8078740 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This cannot be a lazy vote IMO. Gary On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:33 Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I count 2 +1 from PMC member. The vote can passes because no veto (-1 > vote) and perhaps this vote is on under the lazy consensus way? > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > "Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule > unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes > than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- > regardless of the number of votes in each category. (If the number of > votes seems too small to be representative of a community consensus, the > issue is typically not pursued. However, see the description of lazy > consensus for a modifying factor.)" > > > Milamber > > On 29/03/2023 10:03, Mukul Gandhi wrote: > > Hi all, > > We need more Xalan pmc reviews, to have this RC declared to be > approved. > > > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:22=E2=80=AFPM Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmai= l.com> > wrote: > >> Thank you Mukul for this RC. > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> - Reviewing src zip: ASC, SHA files OK. > >> - Building runtime with 'chmod +x ./build.sh && ./build.sh clean > fulldist' OK. > >> - Following the README, there is confusion because the unzipped src zi= p > creates a `xalan-test` folder as a child folder but the README describes = it > as a sibling folder. Does this skew the tests or cause issues? > >> - TODOs later: > >> -- Fix Javadoc errors > >> -- Test output should be quieter in non-debug mode: No need to tell me > all the test files that PASS, I have no idea if I am missing any failure > output without tediously reviewing ALL console output. > >> > >> Using: > >> > >> ant -version > >> Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13 compiled on January 4 2023 > >> > >> java -version > >> openjdk version "1.8.0_362" > >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_362-bre_2023_01_22_03_32-b00) > >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.362-b00, mixed mode) > >> > >> uname -a > >> Darwin *** 22.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.3.0: Mon Jan 30 20:42:11 PS= T > 2023; root:xnu-8792.81.3~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 > >> > >> Gary > > > > --00000000000087efc305f8078740 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"auto">This cannot be a lazy vote IMO.<div dir=3D"auto"><div dir= =3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Gary</div></div></div><br><div class= =3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 29, 2023= , 06:33 Milamber <<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">milamber@apache= .org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"mar= gin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br> <br> I count 2 +1 from PMC member. The vote can passes because no veto (-1 <br> vote) and perhaps this vote is on under the lazy consensus way?<br> <br> <a href=3D"https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html" rel=3D"noreferrer= noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.htm= l</a><br> <br> "Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule = <br> unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes <br> than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- <br> regardless of the number of votes in each category. (If the number of <br> votes seems too small to be representative of a community consensus, the <b= r> issue is typically not pursued. However, see the description of lazy <br> consensus for a modifying factor.)"<br> <br> <br> Milamber<br> <br> On 29/03/2023 10:03, Mukul Gandhi wrote:<br> > Hi all,<br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 We need more Xalan pmc reviews, to have this RC de= clared to be approved.<br> ><br> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:22=E2=80=AFPM Gary Gregory <<a href=3D"ma= ilto:[email protected]" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">garydgreg= [email protected]</a>> wrote:<br> >> Thank you Mukul for this RC.<br> >><br> >> +1<br> >><br> >> - Reviewing src zip: ASC, SHA files OK.<br> >> - Building runtime with 'chmod +x ./build.sh && ./buil= d.sh clean fulldist' OK.<br> >> - Following the README, there is confusion because the unzipped sr= c zip creates a `xalan-test` folder as a child folder but the README descri= bes it as a sibling folder. Does this skew the tests or cause issues?<br> >> - TODOs later:<br> >> -- Fix Javadoc errors<br> >> -- Test output should be quieter in non-debug mode: No need to tel= l me all the test files that PASS, I have no idea if I am missing any failu= re output without tediously reviewing ALL console output.<br> >><br> >> Using:<br> >><br> >> ant -version<br> >> Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13 compiled on January 4 2023<br> >><br> >> java -version<br> >> openjdk version "1.8.0_362"<br> >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_362-bre_2023_01_22_03_32-= b00)<br> >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.362-b00, mixed mode)<br> >><br> >> uname -a<br> >> Darwin *** 22.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.3.0: Mon Jan 30 20:42:1= 1 PST 2023; root:xnu-8792.81.3~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64<br> >><br> >> Gary<br> ><br> <br> </blockquote></div> --00000000000087efc305f8078740--