Re: [request to review, and vote] XalanJ 2.7.3 release candidate RC10

Gary Gregory <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Mar 2023 07:49:26 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xalan.devel,gmane.text.xml.xalan.java.user
Message-ID <CACZkXPxC09OigisYMEBtmT7vEP0Q7=P+cqNsBMCtdgxsGtXLaw@mail.gmail.com>
--00000000000025509505f80892c5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ah! Please accept my apologies!

Gary

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:52 Milamber <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On vote call, Mukul have add this line at the end of mail:
>
> Great work everyone. Here's my +1 for this RC.
>
>
> So two +1 for this vote (you and Mukul)
>
> Milamber
>
> On 29/03/2023 10:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I count one +1 vote (from me). Mukul still has to officially reply with a
> +1 if he so desires to vote even though he called the vote.
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:33 Milamber <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I count 2 +1 from PMC member. The vote can passes because no veto (-1
>> vote) and perhaps this vote is on under the lazy consensus way?
>>
>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>
>> "Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule
>> unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes
>> than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed --
>> regardless of the number of votes in each category. (If the number of
>> votes seems too small to be representative of a community consensus, the
>> issue is typically not pursued. However, see the description of lazy
>> consensus for a modifying factor.)"
>>
>>
>> Milamber
>>
>> On 29/03/2023 10:03, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >      We need more Xalan pmc reviews, to have this RC declared to be
>> approved.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:22=E2=80=AFPM Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gma=
il.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Thank you Mukul for this RC.
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> - Reviewing src zip: ASC, SHA files OK.
>> >> - Building runtime with 'chmod +x ./build.sh && ./build.sh clean
>> fulldist' OK.
>> >> - Following the README, there is confusion because the unzipped src
>> zip creates a `xalan-test` folder as a child folder but the README
>> describes it as a sibling folder. Does this skew the tests or cause issu=
es?
>> >> - TODOs later:
>> >> -- Fix Javadoc errors
>> >> -- Test output should be quieter in non-debug mode: No need to tell m=
e
>> all the test files that PASS, I have no idea if I am missing any failure
>> output without tediously reviewing ALL console output.
>> >>
>> >> Using:
>> >>
>> >> ant -version
>> >> Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13 compiled on January 4 2023
>> >>
>> >> java -version
>> >> openjdk version "1.8.0_362"
>> >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_362-bre_2023_01_22_03_32-b00=
)
>> >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.362-b00, mixed mode)
>> >>
>> >> uname -a
>> >> Darwin *** 22.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.3.0: Mon Jan 30 20:42:11
>> PST 2023; root:xnu-8792.81.3~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
>> >>
>> >> Gary
>> >
>>
>>
>

--00000000000025509505f80892c5
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">Ah! Please accept my apologies!<div dir=3D"auto"><br></di=
v><div dir=3D"auto">Gary</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=
=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:52 Milamber &lt;<a h=
ref=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br></=
div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-lef=
t:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
 =20
   =20
 =20
  <div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF" text=3D"#000000">
    Hi,<br>
    <br>
    On vote call, Mukul have add this line at the end of mail:<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type=3D"cite">
      <pre>Great work everyone. Here&#39;s my +1 for this RC.</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    So two +1 for this vote (you and Mukul)<br>
    <br>
    Milamber<br>
    <br>
    <div>On 29/03/2023 10:37, Gary Gregory
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type=3D"cite">
     =20
     =20
      <div dir=3D"auto">I count one +1 vote (from me). Mukul still has to
        officially reply with a +1 if he so desires to vote even though
        he called the vote.
        <div dir=3D"auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir=3D"auto">Gary</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class=3D"gmail_quote">
        <div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:33
          Milamber &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_bl=
ank" rel=3D"noreferrer">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border=
-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
          <br>
          I count 2 +1 from PMC member. The vote can passes because no
          veto (-1 <br>
          vote) and perhaps this vote is on under the lazy consensus
          way?<br>
          <br>
          <a href=3D"https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html" rel=3D"=
noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://www.apache.org/=
foundation/voting.html</a><br>
          <br>
          &quot;Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of
          majority rule <br>
          unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable
          votes <br>
          than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed
          -- <br>
          regardless of the number of votes in each category. (If the
          number of <br>
          votes seems too small to be representative of a community
          consensus, the <br>
          issue is typically not pursued. However, see the description
          of lazy <br>
          consensus for a modifying factor.)&quot;<br>
          <br>
          <br>
          Milamber<br>
          <br>
          On 29/03/2023 10:03, Mukul Gandhi wrote:<br>
          &gt; Hi all,<br>
          &gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 We need more Xalan pmc reviews, to have =
this RC
          declared to be approved.<br>
          &gt;<br>
          &gt; On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:22=E2=80=AFPM Gary Gregory &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=
=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>&gt;
          wrote:<br>
          &gt;&gt; Thank you Mukul for this RC.<br>
          &gt;&gt;<br>
          &gt;&gt; +1<br>
          &gt;&gt;<br>
          &gt;&gt; - Reviewing src zip: ASC, SHA files OK.<br>
          &gt;&gt; - Building runtime with &#39;chmod +x ./build.sh
          &amp;&amp; ./build.sh clean fulldist&#39; OK.<br>
          &gt;&gt; - Following the README, there is confusion because
          the unzipped src zip creates a `xalan-test` folder as a child
          folder but the README describes it as a sibling folder. Does
          this skew the tests or cause issues?<br>
          &gt;&gt; - TODOs later:<br>
          &gt;&gt; -- Fix Javadoc errors<br>
          &gt;&gt; -- Test output should be quieter in non-debug mode:
          No need to tell me all the test files that PASS, I have no
          idea if I am missing any failure output without tediously
          reviewing ALL console output.<br>
          &gt;&gt;<br>
          &gt;&gt; Using:<br>
          &gt;&gt;<br>
          &gt;&gt; ant -version<br>
          &gt;&gt; Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13 compiled on January 4
          2023<br>
          &gt;&gt;<br>
          &gt;&gt; java -version<br>
          &gt;&gt; openjdk version &quot;1.8.0_362&quot;<br>
          &gt;&gt; OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build
          1.8.0_362-bre_2023_01_22_03_32-b00)<br>
          &gt;&gt; OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.362-b00, mixed
          mode)<br>
          &gt;&gt;<br>
          &gt;&gt; uname -a<br>
          &gt;&gt; Darwin *** 22.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.3.0: Mon
          Jan 30 20:42:11 PST 2023; root:xnu-8792.81.3~2/RELEASE_X86_64
          x86_64<br>
          &gt;&gt;<br>
          &gt;&gt; Gary<br>
          &gt;<br>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div>

</blockquote></div>

--00000000000025509505f80892c5--