Re: [request to review, and vote] XalanJ 2.7.3 release candidate RC10

Milamber <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:04:39 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xalan.devel,gmane.text.xml.xalan.java.user
Organization Apache Software Foundation
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--------------DA9FBADFACC0472147475E09
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



On 29/03/2023 11:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Ah! Please accept my apologies!

👍

So, with last email from Mukul, just need to have the [RESULT] vote mail 
from Mukul to officially have the new xalan release!

Thanks for the contributors (Joseph, Mukul, etc.)

Milamber

>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:52 Milamber <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     On vote call, Mukul have add this line at the end of mail:
>
>>     Great work everyone. Here's my +1 for this RC.
>
>     So two +1 for this vote (you and Mukul)
>
>     Milamber
>
>     On 29/03/2023 10:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>     I count one +1 vote (from me). Mukul still has to officially
>>     reply with a +1 if he so desires to vote even though he called
>>     the vote.
>>
>>     Gary
>>
>>     On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:33 Milamber <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi,
>>
>>         I count 2 +1 from PMC member. The vote can passes because no
>>         veto (-1
>>         vote) and perhaps this vote is on under the lazy consensus way?
>>
>>         https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>
>>         "Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of
>>         majority rule
>>         unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more
>>         favourable votes
>>         than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have
>>         passed --
>>         regardless of the number of votes in each category. (If the
>>         number of
>>         votes seems too small to be representative of a community
>>         consensus, the
>>         issue is typically not pursued. However, see the description
>>         of lazy
>>         consensus for a modifying factor.)"
>>
>>
>>         Milamber
>>
>>         On 29/03/2023 10:03, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
>>         > Hi all,
>>         >      We need more Xalan pmc reviews, to have this RC
>>         declared to be approved.
>>         >
>>         > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:22 PM Gary Gregory
>>         <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>         >> Thank you Mukul for this RC.
>>         >>
>>         >> +1
>>         >>
>>         >> - Reviewing src zip: ASC, SHA files OK.
>>         >> - Building runtime with 'chmod +x ./build.sh && ./build.sh
>>         clean fulldist' OK.
>>         >> - Following the README, there is confusion because the
>>         unzipped src zip creates a `xalan-test` folder as a child
>>         folder but the README describes it as a sibling folder. Does
>>         this skew the tests or cause issues?
>>         >> - TODOs later:
>>         >> -- Fix Javadoc errors
>>         >> -- Test output should be quieter in non-debug mode: No
>>         need to tell me all the test files that PASS, I have no idea
>>         if I am missing any failure output without tediously
>>         reviewing ALL console output.
>>         >>
>>         >> Using:
>>         >>
>>         >> ant -version
>>         >> Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13 compiled on January 4 2023
>>         >>
>>         >> java -version
>>         >> openjdk version "1.8.0_362"
>>         >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build
>>         1.8.0_362-bre_2023_01_22_03_32-b00)
>>         >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.362-b00, mixed mode)
>>         >>
>>         >> uname -a
>>         >> Darwin *** 22.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.3.0: Mon Jan 30
>>         20:42:11 PST 2023; root:xnu-8792.81.3~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
>>         >>
>>         >> Gary
>>         >
>>
>


--------------DA9FBADFACC0472147475E09
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 29/03/2023 11:49, Gary Gregory
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CACZkXPxC09OigisYMEBtmT7vEP0Q7=P+cqNsBMCtdgxsGtXLaw@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="auto">Ah! Please accept my apologies!</div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    👍 <br>
    <br>
    So, with last email from Mukul, just need to have the [RESULT] vote
    mail from Mukul to officially have the new xalan release!<br>
    <br>
    Thanks for the contributors (Joseph, Mukul, etc.)<br>
    <br>
    Milamber<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CACZkXPxC09OigisYMEBtmT7vEP0Q7=P+cqNsBMCtdgxsGtXLaw@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="auto">
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">Gary</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:52
          Milamber &lt;<a href="mailto:[email protected]"
            moz-do-not-send="true">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
          .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
          <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Hi,<br>
            <br>
            On vote call, Mukul have add this line at the end of mail:<br>
            <br>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <pre>Great work everyone. Here's my +1 for this RC.</pre>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
            So two +1 for this vote (you and Mukul)<br>
            <br>
            Milamber<br>
            <br>
            <div>On 29/03/2023 10:37, Gary Gregory wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div dir="auto">I count one +1 vote (from me). Mukul still
                has to officially reply with a +1 if he so desires to
                vote even though he called the vote.
                <div dir="auto"><br>
                </div>
                <div dir="auto">Gary</div>
              </div>
              <br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">
                <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 29, 2023,
                  06:33 Milamber &lt;<a
                    href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank"
                    rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">[email protected]</a>&gt;
                  wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                  .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
                  <br>
                  I count 2 +1 from PMC member. The vote can passes
                  because no veto (-1 <br>
                  vote) and perhaps this vote is on under the lazy
                  consensus way?<br>
                  <br>
                  <a
                    href="https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html"
                    rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html</a><br>
                  <br>
                  "Votes on procedural issues follow the common format
                  of majority rule <br>
                  unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more
                  favourable votes <br>
                  than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to
                  have passed -- <br>
                  regardless of the number of votes in each category.
                  (If the number of <br>
                  votes seems too small to be representative of a
                  community consensus, the <br>
                  issue is typically not pursued. However, see the
                  description of lazy <br>
                  consensus for a modifying factor.)"<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  Milamber<br>
                  <br>
                  On 29/03/2023 10:03, Mukul Gandhi wrote:<br>
                  &gt; Hi all,<br>
                  &gt;      We need more Xalan pmc reviews, to have this
                  RC declared to be approved.<br>
                  &gt;<br>
                  &gt; On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:22 PM Gary Gregory &lt;<a
                    href="mailto:[email protected]" rel="noreferrer
                    noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">[email protected]</a>&gt;
                  wrote:<br>
                  &gt;&gt; Thank you Mukul for this RC.<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; +1<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; - Reviewing src zip: ASC, SHA files OK.<br>
                  &gt;&gt; - Building runtime with 'chmod +x ./build.sh
                  &amp;&amp; ./build.sh clean fulldist' OK.<br>
                  &gt;&gt; - Following the README, there is confusion
                  because the unzipped src zip creates a `xalan-test`
                  folder as a child folder but the README describes it
                  as a sibling folder. Does this skew the tests or cause
                  issues?<br>
                  &gt;&gt; - TODOs later:<br>
                  &gt;&gt; -- Fix Javadoc errors<br>
                  &gt;&gt; -- Test output should be quieter in non-debug
                  mode: No need to tell me all the test files that PASS,
                  I have no idea if I am missing any failure output
                  without tediously reviewing ALL console output.<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; Using:<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; ant -version<br>
                  &gt;&gt; Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13 compiled on
                  January 4 2023<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; java -version<br>
                  &gt;&gt; openjdk version "1.8.0_362"<br>
                  &gt;&gt; OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build
                  1.8.0_362-bre_2023_01_22_03_32-b00)<br>
                  &gt;&gt; OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.362-b00,
                  mixed mode)<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; uname -a<br>
                  &gt;&gt; Darwin *** 22.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version
                  22.3.0: Mon Jan 30 20:42:11 PST 2023;
                  root:xnu-8792.81.3~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; Gary<br>
                  &gt;<br>
                  <br>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------DA9FBADFACC0472147475E09--