Re: [request to review, and vote] XalanJ 2.7.3 release candidate RC10

Gary Gregory <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Mar 2023 08:20:34 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xalan.devel,gmane.text.xml.xalan.java.user
Message-ID <CACZkXPxi5Gw6F=PXCK-RONERZW6d5Z6MY1uxfD4+oyZuzRMCuw@mail.gmail.com>
--00000000000071f9a905f8090124
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 8:04=E2=80=AFAM Milamber <[email protected]> wrot=
e:

>
>
> On 29/03/2023 11:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Ah! Please accept my apologies!
>
>
> =F0=9F=91=8D
>
> So, with last email from Mukul, just need to have the [RESULT] vote mail
> from Mukul to officially have the new xalan release!
>

Where is the 3rd binding vote? I might have missed it. The result email
will list all votes.

Gary

>
> Thanks for the contributors (Joseph, Mukul, etc.)
>
> Milamber
>
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:52 Milamber <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On vote call, Mukul have add this line at the end of mail:
>>
>> Great work everyone. Here's my +1 for this RC.
>>
>>
>> So two +1 for this vote (you and Mukul)
>>
>> Milamber
>>
>> On 29/03/2023 10:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> I count one +1 vote (from me). Mukul still has to officially reply with =
a
>> +1 if he so desires to vote even though he called the vote.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:33 Milamber <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I count 2 +1 from PMC member. The vote can passes because no veto (-1
>>> vote) and perhaps this vote is on under the lazy consensus way?
>>>
>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>>
>>> "Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule
>>> unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes
>>> than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed --
>>> regardless of the number of votes in each category. (If the number of
>>> votes seems too small to be representative of a community consensus, th=
e
>>> issue is typically not pursued. However, see the description of lazy
>>> consensus for a modifying factor.)"
>>>
>>>
>>> Milamber
>>>
>>> On 29/03/2023 10:03, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >      We need more Xalan pmc reviews, to have this RC declared to be
>>> approved.
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:22=E2=80=AFPM Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gm=
ail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Thank you Mukul for this RC.
>>> >>
>>> >> +1
>>> >>
>>> >> - Reviewing src zip: ASC, SHA files OK.
>>> >> - Building runtime with 'chmod +x ./build.sh && ./build.sh clean
>>> fulldist' OK.
>>> >> - Following the README, there is confusion because the unzipped src
>>> zip creates a `xalan-test` folder as a child folder but the README
>>> describes it as a sibling folder. Does this skew the tests or cause iss=
ues?
>>> >> - TODOs later:
>>> >> -- Fix Javadoc errors
>>> >> -- Test output should be quieter in non-debug mode: No need to tell
>>> me all the test files that PASS, I have no idea if I am missing any fai=
lure
>>> output without tediously reviewing ALL console output.
>>> >>
>>> >> Using:
>>> >>
>>> >> ant -version
>>> >> Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13 compiled on January 4 2023
>>> >>
>>> >> java -version
>>> >> openjdk version "1.8.0_362"
>>> >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_362-bre_2023_01_22_03_32-b0=
0)
>>> >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.362-b00, mixed mode)
>>> >>
>>> >> uname -a
>>> >> Darwin *** 22.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.3.0: Mon Jan 30 20:42:11
>>> PST 2023; root:xnu-8792.81.3~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
>>> >>
>>> >> Gary
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>

--00000000000071f9a905f8090124
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr">On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 8:04=E2=80=AFAM M=
ilamber &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&=
gt; wrote:<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_q=
uote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,2=
04);padding-left:1ex">
 =20
   =20
 =20
  <div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF">
    <br>
    <br>
    <div>On 29/03/2023 11:49, Gary Gregory
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type=3D"cite">
     =20
     =20
      <div dir=3D"auto">Ah! Please accept my apologies!</div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    =F0=9F=91=8D <br>
    <br>
    So, with last email from Mukul, just need to have the [RESULT] vote
    mail from Mukul to officially have the new xalan release!<br></div></bl=
ockquote><div><br></div><div>Where is the 3rd binding vote? I might have mi=
ssed it. The result email will list all votes.</div><div><br></div><div>Gar=
y=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px =
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor=
=3D"#FFFFFF">
    <br>
    Thanks for the contributors (Joseph, Mukul, etc.)<br>
    <br>
    Milamber<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type=3D"cite">
      <div dir=3D"auto">
        <div dir=3D"auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir=3D"auto">Gary</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class=3D"gmail_quote">
        <div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:52
          Milamber &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" target=3D"_bl=
ank">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex=
;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"> Hi,<br>
            <br>
            On vote call, Mukul have add this line at the end of mail:<br>
            <br>
            <blockquote type=3D"cite">
              <pre>Great work everyone. Here&#39;s my +1 for this RC.</pre>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
            So two +1 for this vote (you and Mukul)<br>
            <br>
            Milamber<br>
            <br>
            <div>On 29/03/2023 10:37, Gary Gregory wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type=3D"cite">
              <div dir=3D"auto">I count one +1 vote (from me). Mukul still
                has to officially reply with a +1 if he so desires to
                vote even though he called the vote.
                <div dir=3D"auto"><br>
                </div>
                <div dir=3D"auto">Gary</div>
              </div>
              <br>
              <div class=3D"gmail_quote">
                <div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 29, 2023,
                  06:33 Milamber &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]"=
 rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>&gt;
                  wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0=
px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
                  <br>
                  I count 2 +1 from PMC member. The vote can passes
                  because no veto (-1 <br>
                  vote) and perhaps this vote is on under the lazy
                  consensus way?<br>
                  <br>
                  <a href=3D"https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html"=
 rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://www.apa=
che.org/foundation/voting.html</a><br>
                  <br>
                  &quot;Votes on procedural issues follow the common format
                  of majority rule <br>
                  unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more
                  favourable votes <br>
                  than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to
                  have passed -- <br>
                  regardless of the number of votes in each category.
                  (If the number of <br>
                  votes seems too small to be representative of a
                  community consensus, the <br>
                  issue is typically not pursued. However, see the
                  description of lazy <br>
                  consensus for a modifying factor.)&quot;<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  Milamber<br>
                  <br>
                  On 29/03/2023 10:03, Mukul Gandhi wrote:<br>
                  &gt; Hi all,<br>
                  &gt;=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 We need more Xalan pmc reviews, =
to have this
                  RC declared to be approved.<br>
                  &gt;<br>
                  &gt; On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:22=E2=80=AFPM Gary Gregory=
 &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" rel=3D"noreferrer
                    noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a=
>&gt;
                  wrote:<br>
                  &gt;&gt; Thank you Mukul for this RC.<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; +1<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; - Reviewing src zip: ASC, SHA files OK.<br>
                  &gt;&gt; - Building runtime with &#39;chmod +x ./build.sh
                  &amp;&amp; ./build.sh clean fulldist&#39; OK.<br>
                  &gt;&gt; - Following the README, there is confusion
                  because the unzipped src zip creates a `xalan-test`
                  folder as a child folder but the README describes it
                  as a sibling folder. Does this skew the tests or cause
                  issues?<br>
                  &gt;&gt; - TODOs later:<br>
                  &gt;&gt; -- Fix Javadoc errors<br>
                  &gt;&gt; -- Test output should be quieter in non-debug
                  mode: No need to tell me all the test files that PASS,
                  I have no idea if I am missing any failure output
                  without tediously reviewing ALL console output.<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; Using:<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; ant -version<br>
                  &gt;&gt; Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13 compiled on
                  January 4 2023<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; java -version<br>
                  &gt;&gt; openjdk version &quot;1.8.0_362&quot;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build
                  1.8.0_362-bre_2023_01_22_03_32-b00)<br>
                  &gt;&gt; OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.362-b00,
                  mixed mode)<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; uname -a<br>
                  &gt;&gt; Darwin *** 22.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version
                  22.3.0: Mon Jan 30 20:42:11 PST 2023;
                  root:xnu-8792.81.3~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt; Gary<br>
                  &gt;<br>
                  <br>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div>

</blockquote></div></div>

--00000000000071f9a905f8090124--