Re: [request to review, and vote] XalanJ 2.7.3 release candidate RC10
Milamber <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:49:25 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xalan.devel,gmane.text.xml.xalan.java.user |
|---|---|
| Organization | Apache Software Foundation |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--------------DF1D2E4D4BCB203A2BF6F43A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Gary, In the vote process (in ASF), the count of +1 doesn't matter, only -1 vote (veto) are blocker for the vote. So no need the 3rd +1 (binding) (even if will be better) If the number of binding vote is too small (2 votes versus 5 PMC members), after the 72 hours vote period (or more time), the lazy consensus should use (I suppose), otherwise the release will never done. Milamber On 29/03/2023 12:20, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 8:04 AM Milamber <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > On 29/03/2023 11:49, Gary Gregory wrote: >> Ah! Please accept my apologies! > > 👍 > > So, with last email from Mukul, just need to have the [RESULT] > vote mail from Mukul to officially have the new xalan release! > > > Where is the 3rd binding vote? I might have missed it. The result > email will list all votes. > > Gary > > > Thanks for the contributors (Joseph, Mukul, etc.) > > Milamber > >> >> Gary >> >> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:52 Milamber <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On vote call, Mukul have add this line at the end of mail: >> >>> Great work everyone. Here's my +1 for this RC. >> >> So two +1 for this vote (you and Mukul) >> >> Milamber >> >> On 29/03/2023 10:37, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> I count one +1 vote (from me). Mukul still has to officially >>> reply with a +1 if he so desires to vote even though he >>> called the vote. >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:33 Milamber <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I count 2 +1 from PMC member. The vote can passes >>> because no veto (-1 >>> vote) and perhaps this vote is on under the lazy >>> consensus way? >>> >>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >>> >>> "Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of >>> majority rule >>> unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more >>> favourable votes >>> than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have >>> passed -- >>> regardless of the number of votes in each category. (If >>> the number of >>> votes seems too small to be representative of a >>> community consensus, the >>> issue is typically not pursued. However, see the >>> description of lazy >>> consensus for a modifying factor.)" >>> >>> >>> Milamber >>> >>> On 29/03/2023 10:03, Mukul Gandhi wrote: >>> > Hi all, >>> > We need more Xalan pmc reviews, to have this RC >>> declared to be approved. >>> > >>> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:22 PM Gary Gregory >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> >> Thank you Mukul for this RC. >>> >> >>> >> +1 >>> >> >>> >> - Reviewing src zip: ASC, SHA files OK. >>> >> - Building runtime with 'chmod +x ./build.sh && >>> ./build.sh clean fulldist' OK. >>> >> - Following the README, there is confusion because >>> the unzipped src zip creates a `xalan-test` folder as a >>> child folder but the README describes it as a sibling >>> folder. Does this skew the tests or cause issues? >>> >> - TODOs later: >>> >> -- Fix Javadoc errors >>> >> -- Test output should be quieter in non-debug mode: >>> No need to tell me all the test files that PASS, I have >>> no idea if I am missing any failure output without >>> tediously reviewing ALL console output. >>> >> >>> >> Using: >>> >> >>> >> ant -version >>> >> Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13 compiled on January 4 2023 >>> >> >>> >> java -version >>> >> openjdk version "1.8.0_362" >>> >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build >>> 1.8.0_362-bre_2023_01_22_03_32-b00) >>> >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.362-b00, mixed mode) >>> >> >>> >> uname -a >>> >> Darwin *** 22.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.3.0: Mon >>> Jan 30 20:42:11 PST 2023; >>> root:xnu-8792.81.3~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 >>> >> >>> >> Gary >>> > >>> >> > --------------DF1D2E4D4BCB203A2BF6F43A Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> Hi Gary, <br> <br> In the vote process (in ASF), the count of +1 doesn't matter, only -1 vote (veto) are blocker for the vote. So no need the 3rd +1 (binding) (even if will be better)<br> <br> If the number of binding vote is too small (2 votes versus 5 PMC members), after the 72 hours vote period (or more time), the lazy consensus should use (I suppose), otherwise the release will never done.<br> <br> Milamber <br> <br> <br> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 29/03/2023 12:20, Gary Gregory wrote:<br> </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CACZkXPxi5Gw6F=PXCK-RONERZW6d5Z6MY1uxfD4+oyZuzRMCuw@mail.gmail.com"> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> <div dir="ltr"> <div dir="ltr">On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 8:04 AM Milamber <<a href="mailto:[email protected]" moz-do-not-send="true">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br> </div> <div class="gmail_quote"> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <br> <br> <div>On 29/03/2023 11:49, Gary Gregory wrote:<br> </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div dir="auto">Ah! Please accept my apologies!</div> </blockquote> <br> 👍 <br> <br> So, with last email from Mukul, just need to have the [RESULT] vote mail from Mukul to officially have the new xalan release!<br> </div> </blockquote> <div><br> </div> <div>Where is the 3rd binding vote? I might have missed it. The result email will list all votes.</div> <div><br> </div> <div>Gary </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <br> Thanks for the contributors (Joseph, Mukul, etc.)<br> <br> Milamber<br> <br> <blockquote type="cite"> <div dir="auto"> <div dir="auto"><br> </div> <div dir="auto">Gary</div> </div> <br> <div class="gmail_quote"> <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:52 Milamber <<a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br> </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> Hi,<br> <br> On vote call, Mukul have add this line at the end of mail:<br> <br> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre>Great work everyone. Here's my +1 for this RC.</pre> </blockquote> <br> So two +1 for this vote (you and Mukul)<br> <br> Milamber<br> <br> <div>On 29/03/2023 10:37, Gary Gregory wrote:<br> </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div dir="auto">I count one +1 vote (from me). Mukul still has to officially reply with a +1 if he so desires to vote even though he called the vote. <div dir="auto"><br> </div> <div dir="auto">Gary</div> </div> <br> <div class="gmail_quote"> <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 06:33 Milamber <<a href="mailto:[email protected]" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br> </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br> <br> I count 2 +1 from PMC member. The vote can passes because no veto (-1 <br> vote) and perhaps this vote is on under the lazy consensus way?<br> <br> <a href="https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html</a><br> <br> "Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of majority rule <br> unless otherwise stated. That is, if there are more favourable votes <br> than unfavourable ones, the issue is considered to have passed -- <br> regardless of the number of votes in each category. (If the number of <br> votes seems too small to be representative of a community consensus, the <br> issue is typically not pursued. However, see the description of lazy <br> consensus for a modifying factor.)"<br> <br> <br> Milamber<br> <br> On 29/03/2023 10:03, Mukul Gandhi wrote:<br> > Hi all,<br> > We need more Xalan pmc reviews, to have this RC declared to be approved.<br> ><br> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 6:22 PM Gary Gregory <<a href="mailto:[email protected]" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br> >> Thank you Mukul for this RC.<br> >><br> >> +1<br> >><br> >> - Reviewing src zip: ASC, SHA files OK.<br> >> - Building runtime with 'chmod +x ./build.sh && ./build.sh clean fulldist' OK.<br> >> - Following the README, there is confusion because the unzipped src zip creates a `xalan-test` folder as a child folder but the README describes it as a sibling folder. Does this skew the tests or cause issues?<br> >> - TODOs later:<br> >> -- Fix Javadoc errors<br> >> -- Test output should be quieter in non-debug mode: No need to tell me all the test files that PASS, I have no idea if I am missing any failure output without tediously reviewing ALL console output.<br> >><br> >> Using:<br> >><br> >> ant -version<br> >> Apache Ant(TM) version 1.10.13 compiled on January 4 2023<br> >><br> >> java -version<br> >> openjdk version "1.8.0_362"<br> >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_362-bre_2023_01_22_03_32-b00)<br> >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.362-b00, mixed mode)<br> >><br> >> uname -a<br> >> Darwin *** 22.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.3.0: Mon Jan 30 20:42:11 PST 2023; root:xnu-8792.81.3~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64<br> >><br> >> Gary<br> ><br> <br> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> <br> </div> </blockquote> </div> </blockquote> <br> </div> </blockquote> </div> </div> </blockquote> <br> </body> </html> --------------DF1D2E4D4BCB203A2BF6F43A--