Re: [request to review, and vote] XalanJ 2.7.3 release candidate RC10

Hi Mukul,

No need to add another +1 vote. The rules of voting are clear on this point.
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

If the 72 hours delay is done, and *no* -1 binding vote, and two +1 
vote, all seems good for me to release the RC10.

Regards,
Bruno

On 29/03/2023 13:49, Mukul Gandhi wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 5:50 PM Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Where is the 3rd binding vote? I might have missed it.
>> I can see that, the latest Xalan pmc records show that, following are
>> the currently eligible Xalan pmc members to cast binding votes for the
>> releases,
>>
>> Bill Blough,  Gary D. Gregory,  Michael Glavassevich,  Mukul Gandhi,
>> Roger Leigh
>>
>> We've currently achieved two Xalan release binding votes for this RC as follows,
>> Gary Gregory,
>> Mukul Gandhi
>>
>> We still need, at least one more Xalan release binding vote, to have
>> this XalanJ RC approved as a release.
> I've just seen an email from, Apache's respected Rich Bowen, where he
> says following,
>
> "Every PMC member has an equal voice in deliberations. Each has one
> vote. Each has veto power. Every vote weighs the same. It is not only
> your right, but it is your obligation, to use that vote for the good
> of the project and its users, not to appease the Chair, your employer,
> or any other voice in the project."
>
> I think, you and myself, have veto privileges to add one more +1 vote
> for this XalanJ release.
>
> I'm please, using my veto privilege, to add one more +1 vote for this
> XalanJ release.
>
>