Re: [request to review, and vote] XalanJ 2.7.3 release candidate RC10

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 9:49=E2=80=AFAM Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]> wr=
ote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 5:50=E2=80=AFPM Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmai=
l.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Where is the 3rd binding vote? I might have missed it.
> >
> > I can see that, the latest Xalan pmc records show that, following are
> > the currently eligible Xalan pmc members to cast binding votes for the
> > releases,
> >
> > Bill Blough,  Gary D. Gregory,  Michael Glavassevich,  Mukul Gandhi,
> > Roger Leigh
> >
> > We've currently achieved two Xalan release binding votes for this RC as=
 follows,
> > Gary Gregory,
> > Mukul Gandhi
> >
> > We still need, at least one more Xalan release binding vote, to have
> > this XalanJ RC approved as a release.
>
> I've just seen an email from, Apache's respected Rich Bowen, where he
> says following,
>
> "Every PMC member has an equal voice in deliberations. Each has one
> vote. Each has veto power. Every vote weighs the same. It is not only
> your right, but it is your obligation, to use that vote for the good
> of the project and its users, not to appease the Chair, your employer,
> or any other voice in the project."
>
> I think, you and myself, have veto privileges to add one more +1 vote
> for this XalanJ release.
>
> I'm please, using my veto privilege, to add one more +1 vote for this
> XalanJ release.

This makes no sense to me. We need another +1 from a PMC member, one
PMC member equals one vote, not 2.

Gary
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Mukul Gandhi
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>