Re: [request to review, and vote] XalanJ 2.7.3 release candidate RC10

Please see https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html

Gary

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 10:01=E2=80=AFAM Gary Gregory <[email protected]=
om> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 9:49=E2=80=AFAM Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]> =
wrote:
> >
> > Hi Gary,
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 5:50=E2=80=AFPM Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gm=
ail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Where is the 3rd binding vote? I might have missed it.
> > >
> > > I can see that, the latest Xalan pmc records show that, following are
> > > the currently eligible Xalan pmc members to cast binding votes for th=
e
> > > releases,
> > >
> > > Bill Blough,  Gary D. Gregory,  Michael Glavassevich,  Mukul Gandhi,
> > > Roger Leigh
> > >
> > > We've currently achieved two Xalan release binding votes for this RC =
as follows,
> > > Gary Gregory,
> > > Mukul Gandhi
> > >
> > > We still need, at least one more Xalan release binding vote, to have
> > > this XalanJ RC approved as a release.
> >
> > I've just seen an email from, Apache's respected Rich Bowen, where he
> > says following,
> >
> > "Every PMC member has an equal voice in deliberations. Each has one
> > vote. Each has veto power. Every vote weighs the same. It is not only
> > your right, but it is your obligation, to use that vote for the good
> > of the project and its users, not to appease the Chair, your employer,
> > or any other voice in the project."
> >
> > I think, you and myself, have veto privileges to add one more +1 vote
> > for this XalanJ release.
> >
> > I'm please, using my veto privilege, to add one more +1 vote for this
> > XalanJ release.
>
> This makes no sense to me. We need another +1 from a PMC member, one
> PMC member equals one vote, not 2.
>
> Gary
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Mukul Gandhi
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >