Re: [request to review, and vote] XalanJ 2.7.3 release candidate RC10

Hi Gary,

On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 7:31=E2=80=AFPM Gary Gregory <[email protected]=
m> wrote:

> This makes no sense to me. We need another +1 from a PMC member, one
> PMC member equals one vote, not 2.

The document https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html, says following,

"Voting periods should generally run for at least 72 hours to provide
an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate, regardless of
their geographic location." [1]

I think, if we receive one more +1 vote from a PMC member, that shall
be an ideal result for this vote to pass.

But the point [1] mentioned above, makes me feel that, if we don't get
one more +1 vote within next few days, we can possibly have this
XalanJ RC approved to be a release.

Meanwhile, I'm explicitly copying this mail, to Michael Glavassevich
as well, so that he can try his best to vote for this XalanJ RC.


--=20
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi