online XML Schema validation service
Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Jun 2020 09:25:50 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xerces-j.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABuuzNObrFPi6K2zhCh9m6Md88z9CQwop_9P1SCcPeRkOP=Bzg@mail.gmail.com> |
--0000000000001039b105a78a97ba Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi all, Sometime ago, I had deployed an 'online XML Schema validation service' based on Xerces-J here, https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/. I'm thinking to provide Saxon as an additional option, for XML Schema validation to the preceding mentioned 'online XML Schema validation service' (i.e, as per my proposal, the preceding mentioned site shall provide both Xerces-J and Saxon as options. I guess, that would be more useful to users of the preceding mentioned site). If anyone has any concerns about this, please let us know. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi --0000000000001039b105a78a97ba Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi all,</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Somet= ime ago, I had deployed an 'online XML Schema validation service' b= ased on Xerces-J here, <a href=3D"https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidati= on/">https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/</a>. I'm thinking to = provide Saxon as an additional option, for XML Schema validation to the pre= ceding mentioned 'online XML Schema validation service' (i.e, as pe= r my proposal, the preceding mentioned site=C2=A0shall=C2=A0provide both Xe= rces-J and Saxon as options. I guess, that=C2=A0would be more useful to use= rs of the preceding mentioned site). If anyone has any concerns about this,= please let us know.</div><div><br></div><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-= - <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature" data-smartmail=3D"gmail_si= gnature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Regards,<br>Mukul Gandhi<br><br></div></div>= </div></div></div> --0000000000001039b105a78a97ba--