Re: online XML Schema validation service

Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:37:30 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xerces-j.user
Message-ID <CABuuzNPr+bXqw_aS2W13zn_BW3_uzsYCqBmrDfe0+R7uB=ZG_A@mail.gmail.com>
--000000000000591d0805a7b8da0a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi all,
   I've been thinking a bit deeply, about proposal mentioned in below mail,
and following are my new thoughts,

I think, it wouldn't look ok to have the site
https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/ provide XML Schema validation
using Saxon. My primary intention of developing the site
https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/, was to build it over Xerces-J.

Therefore, I shall follow as per my new thoughts.

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 9:25 AM Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>    Sometime ago, I had deployed an 'online XML Schema validation service'
> based on Xerces-J here, https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/. I'm
> thinking to provide Saxon as an additional option, for XML Schema
> validation to the preceding mentioned 'online XML Schema validation
> service' (i.e, as per my proposal, the preceding mentioned
> site shall provide both Xerces-J and Saxon as options. I guess, that would
> be more useful to users of the preceding mentioned site). If anyone has any
> concerns about this, please let us know.
>



-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

--000000000000591d0805a7b8da0a
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi all,</div><div>=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0I&#39;ve been thinking a bit deeply, about proposal mentioned =
in below mail, and following are my new thoughts,</div><div><br></div><div>=
I think, it wouldn&#39;t look ok to have the site <a href=3D"https://www.so=
ftwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/">https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation=
/</a> provide XML Schema validation using Saxon. My primary intention of de=
veloping the site <a href=3D"https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/">=
https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/</a>, was to build it over Xerc=
es-J.</div><div><br></div><div>Therefore, I shall follow as per my new thou=
ghts.</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_a=
ttr">On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 9:25 AM Mukul Gandhi &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:muku=
[email protected]">[email protected]</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rg=
b(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi =
all,</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Sometime ago, I had deployed an &#39;online XML=
 Schema validation service&#39; based on Xerces-J here, <a href=3D"https://=
www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/" target=3D"_blank">https://www.softwar=
ebytes.org/xmlvalidation/</a>. I&#39;m thinking to provide Saxon as an addi=
tional option, for XML Schema validation to the preceding mentioned &#39;on=
line XML Schema validation service&#39; (i.e, as per my proposal, the prece=
ding mentioned site=C2=A0shall=C2=A0provide both Xerces-J and Saxon as opti=
ons. I guess, that=C2=A0would be more useful to users of the preceding ment=
ioned site). If anyone has any concerns about this, please let us know.</di=
v></div></div></blockquote><div>=C2=A0</div></div><br clear=3D"all"><div><b=
r></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr">=
<div>Regards,<br>Mukul Gandhi<br></div></div></div></div></div></div>

--000000000000591d0805a7b8da0a--