Re: online XML Schema validation service
Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Jun 2020 16:37:30 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xerces-j.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABuuzNPr+bXqw_aS2W13zn_BW3_uzsYCqBmrDfe0+R7uB=ZG_A@mail.gmail.com> |
--000000000000591d0805a7b8da0a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi all, I've been thinking a bit deeply, about proposal mentioned in below mail, and following are my new thoughts, I think, it wouldn't look ok to have the site https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/ provide XML Schema validation using Saxon. My primary intention of developing the site https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/, was to build it over Xerces-J. Therefore, I shall follow as per my new thoughts. On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 9:25 AM Mukul Gandhi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > Sometime ago, I had deployed an 'online XML Schema validation service' > based on Xerces-J here, https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/. I'm > thinking to provide Saxon as an additional option, for XML Schema > validation to the preceding mentioned 'online XML Schema validation > service' (i.e, as per my proposal, the preceding mentioned > site shall provide both Xerces-J and Saxon as options. I guess, that would > be more useful to users of the preceding mentioned site). If anyone has any > concerns about this, please let us know. > -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi --000000000000591d0805a7b8da0a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi all,</div><div>= =C2=A0 =C2=A0I've been thinking a bit deeply, about proposal mentioned = in below mail, and following are my new thoughts,</div><div><br></div><div>= I think, it wouldn't look ok to have the site <a href=3D"https://www.so= ftwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/">https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation= /</a> provide XML Schema validation using Saxon. My primary intention of de= veloping the site <a href=3D"https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/">= https://www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/</a>, was to build it over Xerc= es-J.</div><div><br></div><div>Therefore, I shall follow as per my new thou= ghts.</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_a= ttr">On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 9:25 AM Mukul Gandhi <<a href=3D"mailto:muku= [email protected]">[email protected]</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class= =3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rg= b(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Hi = all,</div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A0Sometime ago, I had deployed an 'online XML= Schema validation service' based on Xerces-J here, <a href=3D"https://= www.softwarebytes.org/xmlvalidation/" target=3D"_blank">https://www.softwar= ebytes.org/xmlvalidation/</a>. I'm thinking to provide Saxon as an addi= tional option, for XML Schema validation to the preceding mentioned 'on= line XML Schema validation service' (i.e, as per my proposal, the prece= ding mentioned site=C2=A0shall=C2=A0provide both Xerces-J and Saxon as opti= ons. I guess, that=C2=A0would be more useful to users of the preceding ment= ioned site). If anyone has any concerns about this, please let us know.</di= v></div></div></blockquote><div>=C2=A0</div></div><br clear=3D"all"><div><b= r></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr">= <div>Regards,<br>Mukul Gandhi<br></div></div></div></div></div></div> --000000000000591d0805a7b8da0a--