Re: inline-progression-dimension for DOCX coming soon?
Hussein Shafie <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xfc.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 09/20/2013 05:30 PM, Robert Gurol wrote: > > I am curious whether implementation of the FO attributes listed as > Area Dimension Properties in the conformance statement, especially > inline-progression-dimension, is planned in releases for XFC's DOCX > output in the near future? Sorry but the answer is no. > > My use case is that I define an external-graphic inside a table-cell > that, not knowing whether the graphic's absolute width exceeds the > table-cell's width. Using inline-progression-dimension.maximum and > inline-progression-dimension.optimum, I can make it work with FOP's > PDF output, though not with DOCX. > > <table-cell border="solid 1pt" > border-color="#999999" padding="2pt" > text-align="left"> > <block text-align="left"> > ... > <external-graphic > content-height="scale-down-to-fit" > content-type="content-type:image/jpg" > content-width="scale-down-to-fit" > inline-progression-dimension.maximum="100%" > inline-progression-dimension.optimum="100mm" > scaling="uniform" > src="..."/> In the case of XFC, I'm not sure that: content-width="scale-down-to-fit" inline-progression-dimension.maximum="100%" could be translated to something supported by MS-Word. -- XMLmind FO Converter Support List [email protected] http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xfc-support