Re: 1.1 and 1.2 Releases.

On 4/5/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Todd Byrne wrote:
> >     Todd Byrne wrote:
> >      > So whats the big plan? Where do we want to head from here?
> >
> >     I meant to tell you earlier but forgot... I tried to come up with
> some
> >     realistic plan for 1.1 and 1.2 releases -- checked in here:
> >
> >
> > I really think we should push 1.1 release ASAP, I have been using trunk
> > code for about a year now, seems pretty stable.
>
> Yep, I'm currently working on documentation and release packaging. I would
> like
> to roll both jar and war releases into single bin release, and do other
> tweaks.
>
> Once this is ready I will create builds to check for any issues with
> bat/sh
> scripts and release layout. And after this is done, actual release can be
> made
> and voted upon.
>
> I'm thinking to finish all this within 2 weeks.
>
>
> > I will take a look at the hash filter code and some of the documentation
> > if you need help.
>
> For hash filer I think we could just use same logic as in String.hashCode
> ().


I will take a look.

> On the first item with the .bat file do we need a sh file also?
>
> I checked in sh script already - can you tackle the bat?


Consider it done.

<snip/>
>
> >      > Would be nice to get a XQuery implementation started.
> > XUpdate  is pretty dead, and  XQuery has its own update syntax might
> > just be worth not dealing with keeping our own branch of the XUpdate
> code.
>
> After 1.1 is out we can discuss XQuery...


Yeah no XQuery should be 1.2-1.3, I was going to throw javacc at xquery
grammer file from W3C. I will report back what can of time commitment it
might take to do.

Vadim
>