RE: Clever idea for func:script (was xmlns:exslt)

Uche:
    I personally would be all for replacing the specification 
    for func:script/@language to be an Internet media type, 
    although I wonder whether it should then be renamed 
    func:script/@type, with @language immediately deprecated.
    
    I also wonder how problematic this would be on deployed legacy.


I favour the attribute approach, since as is pointed out,
language + namespaces haven't collided yet.
 I'm  bothered about the language version, but unsure if
it really is an issue? Uche, how likely is it that Python
will change sufficiently to impact an exslt implementation?
  Or should we look to Murphy's law :-)
Only other issue, language="python" vs xml:lang="EN-UK" ?
Are they sufficiently far apart?

regards DaveP

-- 
DISCLAIMER: 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system. 

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by 
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. 

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of RNIB. 

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk