Re: No-fail `document` Function Spec
James Fuller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xslt.extensions |
|---|---|
| Organization | Webcomposite |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
John L. Clark wrote: >While the environment variables namespace proposal is still pending, I >thought I might start work on the next item on the EXSLT TODO list. For >me, this is the Resource module, and I decided to start with the no-fail >document function. I should have attached the source XML and the user >HTML view for this function to this email. I can also send the use-case >sources and the module file, if people want to hack on those as well at >this time. > > looks good to me, I would suggest changing is the namespace prefix from rslt: to result: also there is probably value in including in the example a protocol type error cheers, Jim Fuller