Re: No-fail `document` Function Spec
"John L. Clark" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xslt.extensions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20060228070651.GD10347@rejoice> |
Jim,
Thanks for commenting on this.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:46:59AM +0100, James Fuller wrote:
> looks good to me,
>
> I would suggest changing is the namespace prefix from
>
> rslt: to result:
That's easily done; I'll hold off on sending out a new version until I
can collect some more feedback to group with this change.
> also there is probably value in including in the example a protocol type
> error
I know that I didn't include a protocol error in the examples section,
but the spec portion itself shows what a protocol error would look like.
You don't think that's sufficient?
Take care,
John L. Clark
_______________________________________________
exslt mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.exslt.org/list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEA/aLjkcskvOyl78RAuJmAJ4vEaOS4v2ib2Ej74951llOIbUvwACgnnea VfykCQE3f8qyuvwntXocCeg= =oJlj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----