Re: No-fail `document` Function Spec
"John L. Clark" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xslt.extensions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20060228080521.GE10347@rejoice> |
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 08:14:01AM +0100, James Fuller wrote:
> >I know that I didn't include a protocol error in the examples section,
> >but the spec portion itself shows what a protocol error would look like.
> >You don't think that's sufficient?
> makes it complete imho, though not required.
Fair enough; I came up with an amusing example for this case. You'll
have to let me know what you think. :) I should've attached the source
and the HTML view to this email.
Take care,
John L. Clark
_______________________________________________
exslt mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.exslt.org/list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEBARBjkcskvOyl78RAuvnAJ9/94kzOKaHvMZI0BsbfQdFYJs29ACgxRoO DMv1lInDMKOd2AQ/3B71kco= =CHoa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----