Re: What _should_ we be doing with bibliographic data (Was: Slightly OT: MARC)
Patrick Durusau <patrick-Q/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Murray, On 7/20/2010 5:47 PM, Murray Altheim wrote: <snip> > Hi Stuart, > > Just put *one* URL into the metadata, one that points to an online > record. If you treat that URL as persistent, that record won't grow > stale (as would any URLs included in the published eBook), and you > can update it as necessary. You can also improve and update the > service behind that URL at any time. It's also easier for the user > in that their only option is to resolve one URL, which can point > to a page with further actions and suitable documentation. > +1! Not to mention that users who can consume more information can resolve the URL to obtain additional information, including additional identifiers. Hope you are having a great day! Patrick -- Patrick Durusau patrick-Q/[email protected] Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300 Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net Homepage: http://www.durusau.net Twitter: patrickDurusau