Re: MARCXML to Topic Maps implementation!
Lars Heuer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Semagia |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Aki, I uploaded your topic map to Maiana: <http://maiana.topicmapslab.de/u/lars/tm/marc-tm-akis-example> (using your <http://www.wandora.org/wandora/download/other/marc2topicmap_example.zip>) [MARCXML -> Topic Maps] > When a record is found > Create a topic for the record > For each field in the record > Create an association where association type is field code > For each subfield > Create a role topic using subfield code > Create a player topic using subfield value > Add created player and role to the association > If a field has an indicator > Add it to the association as a player with a static role > Simple as that. I know that this is meant as prototype but I think without a proper ontology this translation makes not much sense. You put MARCXML into a a Topic Maps envelope and that's it. I suspect that the topic map provides any advantage over the MARCXML records. Don't get me wrong, I back your effort and I think it is good to see that someone does actually something, but the advantages of Topic Maps remain unclear if you translate MARCXML literally to Topic Maps. Best regards, Lars -- Semagia <http://www.semagia.com> <http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list <http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine <http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine