Re: MARCXML to Topic Maps implementation!

Lars Heuer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xtm.general
Organization Semagia
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Aki,

I uploaded your topic map to Maiana:
<http://maiana.topicmapslab.de/u/lars/tm/marc-tm-akis-example>
(using your
<http://www.wandora.org/wandora/download/other/marc2topicmap_example.zip>)


[MARCXML -> Topic Maps]
> When a record is found
>    Create a topic for the record
>    For each field in the record
>       Create an association where association type is field code
>       For each subfield
>          Create a role topic using subfield code
>          Create a player topic using subfield value
>          Add created player and role to the association
>       If a field has an indicator
>          Add it to the association as a player with a static role

> Simple as that.

I know that this is meant as prototype but I think without a proper
ontology this translation makes not much sense. You put MARCXML into a
a Topic Maps envelope and that's it.

I suspect that the topic map provides any advantage over the MARCXML
records.

Don't get me wrong, I back your effort and I think it is good to see
that someone does actually something, but the advantages of Topic Maps
remain unclear if you translate MARCXML literally to Topic Maps.

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia 
<http://www.semagia.com>

<http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list
<http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine
<http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.