Re: TMCL: tmcl:see-also vs. rdfs:seeAlso
Lars Marius Garshol <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Khalil Ahmed > I think its a bad idea as the definition of tmcl:see-also states that > it is intended for use in documenting TMCL constructs, but the > application of rdfs:seeAlso is much broader. Indeed. rdfs:seeAlso is pretty much equivalent to an untyped (well, default-typed) external occurrence. But for a number of reasons (like roundtripping) going with alternative (a) seems best, as Kal says. --Lars M. http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/ http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/