Explaining forms
Robert Cerny <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xtm.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I am trying to improve Topincs forms in such a way that a small explanation of the form field is offered. This becomes handy as soon as the field (statement) becomes more complicated, e.g. as recently shown in the newcomb number store [1]. Now i am wondering where to put this information in the topic map in such a way that it is possible to have a different explanation depending on the perspective of an association. a. use tmcl:description occurrences on occurrence type and name type. make a custom occurrence type perspective description (scoped by role type and language) for association types b. use tmcl:description occurrences on the constraints ((is it intended for this purpose?) c. use a custom occurrence type on the constraints b and c additionally offer the advantage of being able to describe subject locator and subject identifier constraints, which not possible with a. Currently I am in favor of c. Any thoughts or experiences? Robert [1] http://www.topincs.com/newcombnumber/