Re: Explaining forms

Graham,

Am 20.10.2010 um 16:18 schrieb Graham Moore:

> One way to see it is that the tmcl:description  is really about
> providing information about the logical model and its constraints.
> Where as you seem to be talking about the interaction with a given
> construct in a specific application and environment. While I don't
> doubt that this a class of usage I don't think its in the same class
> as abstract schema annotations.

Yes, i agree that those description would not explain anything, quite  
the opposite: they would rather confuse the user :)

> I would go for C and publish the SI for the property type.

http://www.topincs.com/topincs/explanation

> A model for 'The annotations for guiding and helping human usage of  
> TMCL
> components' would be neat. :)

Not sure what you mean.

Robert