Re: SDshare push

Lars Heuer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xtm.general
Organization Semagia
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Lars,


[...]
> I see what you mean (and I didn't really before). This is actually
> a completely different protocol.

ACK. I haven't seen that either until your msg dtd. Fri, 28 Jan 2011.

> It's not necessarily a bad idea, but it's not what I had in mind
> with SDshare push at all.

ACK.

[...]
> However, that's not what I'm trying to do. I have a production
> server separated from the editorial server by a firewall. I can't
> use SDshare to keep the two in sync, because the production server
> can't connect to the editorial server (where changes actually
> happen). So instead of the production server polling the editorial
> server for changes I want to have the editorial server push changes
> to the production server. (The firewall does allow connections that way.)

I see. So wouldn't APP + PubSubHubbub yield the same result? We could
reuse some (de-facto) standards.

[...]
>> My goal was that the user modify the feed via APP/REST. I don't see
>> how it could be done with SDShare push.

> It couldn't. But then it was never the goal, either. :)

:)

[...]
>> I see. I think that I still prefer one request per fragment since a
>> fragment is a self-encapsulated entity (the result of a successful
>> operation on a topic within a topic map).

> Well, you could just as well have N fragments be the result of a
> single operation. One example is modifying an association. Another
> would be a tolog update statement. A third would be a single
> transaction against a TM.

Right. My response contained a paragraph why a batch update which
represents a TMQL/tolog transaction would fail in both use cases
(obvious vs. batch) but I removed it since I was unsure if it's a
failure in my way of thinking or in SDShare push. :)

I have to think about it; I'll come back to this issue.

[...]
> In your use case that's true. In mine it's not.

ACK.


Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia 
<http://www.semagia.com>

<https://twitter.com/larsheuer/> Twitter
<http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list
<http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine
<http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.