Re: SDshare push

* Lars Heuer
> 
> I see. So wouldn't APP + PubSubHubbub yield the same result? We could
> reuse some (de-facto) standards.

It could, if we take the APP + PubSubHubbub protocols with some minor overrides of method semantics. However, to see my rationales for why not, please loop back to the beginning of the thread. :-)

> Right. My response contained a paragraph why a batch update which
> represents a TMQL/tolog transaction would fail in both use cases
> (obvious vs. batch) but I removed it since I was unsure if it's a
> failure in my way of thinking or in SDShare push. :)

I've no idea. To me, if a bunch of changes were done as a single atomic operation, it would make sense to transfer them that way, too.

--Lars M.
http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/
http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/