Re: SDshare push

Hi Lars,

[...]
> Either you are talking about normal SDshare, or you have
> client/server reversed.

What's "normal" SDShare? What's abnormal SDShare? ;)

A, was updated. It likes to tell B about it. I sends a (batch) update
to B. B accepts it. Is B requested to update the feed with all updates
of A? IMO it is not. Neither the SDShare spec. nor the SDShare push
proposal mandates that.

> In any case, I found this too confusing to follow. :)

Fair enough. ;)

> I think so. I find your argument telling: "more elegant". That does
> indicate it's a matter of taste, which is fair enough.

:) Okay, but if you see the current de-facto standards around Atom,
the current proposal "stands out". And aside from my personal taste of
simplicity and elegance, I wonder why the solution should stand out
and not simply adopt the provided solutions.

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia 
<http://www.semagia.com>

<https://twitter.com/larsheuer/> Twitter
<http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list
<http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine
<http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine