Re: SDshare push

* Lars Heuer
> 
> What's "normal" SDShare? What's abnormal SDShare? ;)

Normal SDshare is that described in the spec. SDshare push is what I described. They have the client/server roles reversed, hence the confusion.

> A, was updated. It likes to tell B about it. I sends a (batch) update
> to B. B accepts it.

This is SDshare push.

> Is B requested to update the feed with all updates of A?

Who says B has any feed at all? It's pretty likely that it doesn't have any feed at all.

> IMO it is not.

Agreed.

> Neither the SDShare spec. nor the SDShare push proposal mandates that.

You seemed to regard that as a failing somehow, but I can't see why. Personally, I think it's good to decouple like this.

> :) Okay, but if you see the current de-facto standards around Atom,
> the current proposal "stands out". And aside from my personal taste of
> simplicity and elegance, I wonder why the solution should stand out
> and not simply adopt the provided solutions.

We've been over this before. I don't think I have anything new to add this time around.

--Lars M.
http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/
http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/