Re: SDshare push

Lars Heuer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xtm.general
Organization Semagia
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Lars,

[...]
>> Is B requested to update the feed with all updates of A?

> Who says B has any feed at all? It's pretty likely that it doesn't
> have any feed at all.

Now I am completely lost. Why do you put the fragments into an Atom
envelope if B has no feed?

Your use case seems to be "issue an update of the topic map at B". You
don't need SDShare at all. If neither A nor B needs a feed, I don't
understand what the proposal has in common with SDShare aside from
reusing the TopicSI/TopicSL elements and the fragment update
algorithm. Given that, I think that the proposal solves a special
use-case and should not belong to the core spec. of SDShare.

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia 
<http://www.semagia.com>

<https://twitter.com/larsheuer/> Twitter
<http://www.topicmaps.de/mailinglist/> German Topic Maps mailing list
<http://tinytim.sourceforge.net/> Open Source Topic Maps engine
<http://mappa.semagia.com/> Mappa - Python Topic Maps engine
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.